At current, there is a tidal wave of Generation X females who are trying to have children but are realizing that they waited too long and are now infertile. This issue is addressed in the book The Big Lie: Motherhood, Feminism, and the Reality of the Biological Clock by Tanya Selvaratnam; I picked this book up because I wanted to broaden my masculine outlook on the world. Tanya is a vagina-wielding feminist who waited till she was in her late 30’s to try to have kids and subsequently had 3 miscarriages and an unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF). She pursued her career through her 20’s and 30’s and didn’t want to sacrifice her professional status for the necessities of raising a family. The feminist movement of the 1960’s/70’s made her, and many of her fellow friends, look at their mother’s domesticity as a prison sentence and men as the guards who got to leave for the freedom of the office.
Now, in 2015, there are a myriad of women trying to have babies in their 30’s and 40’s who are confronted with the fact that their uterus’ are dried up and not working. The chance of conceiving a child at age 15 is between 40-50%, at age 35 between 15-20%, and at age 45 between 3-5%. Additionally, a female has a finite number of eggs with 300,000-400,000 at the first period, 39,000-52,000 by age 30 and 9,000-12,000 by age 40; along with the decreased number of eggs there is an increased number that have chromosomal abnormalities which increase the risks for miscarriages and genetic disorders. So the big lie that Tanya writes about is that women can do what they want on their own time tables. This lie was made popular by procedures like IVF which created the allusion that having children later in life was a realistic possibility. The unfortunate truth is that IVF has a very low success rate; the averages fall below that of the natural conception averages which were listed above. Assisted Reproductive Technology, in general, is usually not covered by insurance (unless you live in select states), creates a huge strain on relationships (women were cited saying IVF was more stressful then their divorces), and can result in unnatural frequency of twins, triplets, or octomoms.
IVF has allowed countless families to have children but the author’s point is that it shouldn’t be used as a realistic family-planning option. Women need to ask themselves if they want children, and if they do, then they need to seriously think about their biological clocks. I believe that family and relationships should come before a career. Women and men in their 20’s should not preoccupy themselves with the pursuit of money and status but rather the pursuit of finding someone to share their lives with. My beef with feminism is that it created (not on purpose) a negative image of the house wife and of women who chose to have a kid instead of pursuing a career. Taking care of a child or fostering the love of a family is the greatest undertaking a human being can pursue. I believe that both men and women should make their top priority the harboring of relationships-having a child is the great example of this. There are compromises to be had, and I think that you can have a career and a family. A man can stay home and raise the kids, a woman can work remotely from home, a couple can downsize expenses and both work part time, etc. If you are in your 20’s, and you know you want a baby one day, get your finances in place; the latest I would wait is 30 to start trying to conceive. If you are older or do not have a spouse, look into freezing your eggs as early as possible. Go on eHarmony or match.com and stop waiting for someone to fall out of the sky. Put the pursuit of relationships first and foremost in your life because you will never find satisfaction in the pursuit of power, money, or status.
What are your thoughts on feminism? How should people plan for their future family? What values should we put as our top priorities?